Español
  • Free case evaluation!
  • No fees unless we recover money for you!
Call Us Today
Toll Free: 1-888-474-2352    Local: 619-528-8454

Archive for the ‘Construction Workers’ Rights’ Category

JAIL TIME FOR DANGEROUS EMPLOYERS IS REAL FALL PROTECTION

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

In addition to a successful civil lawsuit,  criminal prosecution of an employer who repeats Osha Safety Violations is a viable way to deter dangerous practices and encourage safety.

In 2008 a California Roofing Company had repeated Osha Violations for dangerous practices and lack of safety equipment.  A worker fell 40 feet to his death onto a concrete side walk. There were no railings, scaffolds, barriers or safety belts available for the worker. The young worker’s large family is left with less than a year’s wages for his death to replace him.

The owner, supervisor and foreman were indicted but claimed a flat roof did not require fall safety protection.  However, they plead guilty to felonies in criminal court. These are knowingly, wilful, violations.  Osha is to be commended for turning these and other cases over to public prosecutors.  Osha provides the investigative work up and testimony.

Aggressive criminal prosecutions for wilful and knowing violations of Osha fall protection will hasten safety practices by employers and contractors in the construction industry. News of this prosecution should be wide spread.  Construction workers will work safe if provided the safety equipment causing injuries and deaths to go down.

FINALLY SOME REAL FALL PROTECTION

Monday, April 18th, 2011

Falls are the number one cause of serious injury and death in building construction.  An average of 40 workers are killed annually as a result of falls from residential roofs.  These deaths are preventable by reasonble fall protection methods.

However, for years subcontractors and general contractors have avoided real fall protection claiming exemption for residential buildings.  No wonder that is a leading cause of construction deaths.  Workers are maimed and die without reasonable fall protection.  Real fall protection saves lives.

An appeals court recently upheld an appeal by roofing subcontractors and general contractors seeking continued exclusion for reasonable fall protection by residential contractors.   The court ruled that residential contractors must comply with OSHA Fall Protection Rules and would not be exempted out.

This is a good positive change and you can expect a drop in serious injuries and fatalities in residential construction from trades working on roofs.  Construction and roofing companies have until June 16, 2011 to comply with the new directive.

THE ECONOMY AND WORK ACCIDENT STATISTICS

Tuesday, September 28th, 2010

The Department of Labor, Unions, and contractors have recently touted fewer deaths and reduced accidents in the work force as evidence of effective accident prevention.  However, it is misleading and self aggrandizing to attribute these statistics to contractor’s safety awareness.  OSHA accurately reported the reason for the downturn in accidents.

The devil is in the details.

The truth is that the work place has become an even more dangerous place to be in the past 5 years.

Construction projects are down.  Contractors have shut their doors.  The construction industry is down along with the economy.  Home sales are down.  Construction work hours are down.

OSHA documents daily deaths in the work place.  Even with the industry down turn, serious injuries and being in mangled on the job have not slowed according to construction safety magazines.

So, what is this dichotomy of work accidents and deaths declining but reported deaths, accidents, and OSHA Citations still showing an increase?

The number one concern for workers in the United States is not wages.  It is not work hours or even benefits.

THE NUMBER ONE CONCERN for American Workers is safety.

Why is their concern safety if work deaths and accidents are down significantly?  Aren’t American Workers getting what they wanted in reduced accidents and a safer work place?  No.  Workers continue to be concerned about work safety because they know that it is not getting safer but more dangerous in the work place.

Work accidents and deaths are down because man hours are down with this recession.  As a percentage of work hours, work accidents have increased.  Economists and business statisticians tell us that in a recession when workers are laid off, businesses become more efficient and production increases.  This may be true in some instances but what is clear is that in a recession the first thing to go is safety programs and safety concerns.  The work place becomes more dangerous.

Do not let your eagerness to work and earn blind you to safety.  Safety is and should continue to be your NUMBER ONE concern.

Workplace Weed: Safety vs. Medicine?

Friday, May 7th, 2010

Medical marijuana is legal in 14 states.  Politicians pandering for votes should account to all working Americans for the unintended consequences of legalization.  A simple hypothetical taken from real life is illustrative.

A forklift driver carrying a load of pallets runs into you, a water bottle vendor, breaking your hip, leg, and causing serious and permanent brain damage.  
Are you and your family limited to a small Workers’ Compensation recovery?

Answer:  No.  You will be able to recover Workers’ Compensation from your employer and sue the forklift driver and his company in civil court for a full recovery.  Most companies have liability insurance for this.

You demand the forklift operator take a drug test immediately.  Result?

Answer:  Probably.  It is unclear if you can make the demand.  If the forklift driver signed a written consent to submit to drug testing as a condition of employment, then refusal to his employer could be grounds for termination.   The refusal probably doesn’t come into evidence in a civil case. 

The forklift driver consents to the drug test and is positive for marijuana (THC)?  Result?

Answer:  Depends.  The forklift driver has a prescription for medical marijuana to relieve chronic arthritic pain.  THC will appear on a test 30 days after use.  There is no test, as in alcohol, to determine the level of THC for impairment. 

The drug testing consent states that any level of drugs including PCH is grounds for termination?  Result?

Answer:  Unknown:  Absent some impairment testimony termination is in doubt.   Absent impairment testimony the presence of THC would probably not be admissible in the civil action depending on the jurisdiction.

The injured water truck driver tests positive for THC.  Recovery denied? 

Absolutely not.  This office has had two similar cases.  We argued to exclude the THC  test and it was not admitted.   The two cases settled for a total of $7M when THC was found in a drug screen at the hospital.  However, there was no level of impairment testimony and it was not admissible to the jury.

Advanced Hypothetical:  The forklift employee  informed his employer previously of the medical marijuana and gave a copy of the prescription that appeared in his personnel file.  What do you think?

Law School Exam:  The forklift driver had a previous positive test for TCH OTJ after reckless driving of forklift.  What happens next?

There are pending cases of workers with medical marijuana prescriptions litigating against disciplinary actions for medical marijuana use.  The use of medical marijuana pits conflicting interests of a least four groups against each other:

1.  The medical marijuana user-worker who has medical needs, political interests and constitutional rights of privacy,

2.  The non user-worker whose safety and constitutional rights of association,

3.  The government agencies such as OSHA obligated to enforce a drug free work environment.

4.  The employer responsible for workplace safety without violating medical rights,

Politicians who flirt with voters over medical marijuana legalization and pander to the medical marijuana users or conservatives against any legalization should be forced to deal with the harder issues and consider the safety and rights of all workers in the work place.

What do you think?  Is this any different than a forklift driver taking another prescription drug that causes a drowsy accident?  Please write and tell us and tell us if you are a worker, employer, user, nonuser, etc.  No personal info please.

Cheating the Injured Construction Worker

Friday, April 23rd, 2010

In addition to the pain, isolation, and economic hardship caused by an on the job injury an innocent worker injured on the job will quickly find that the foreman and co workers are openly hostile and wrongfully blaming the injured worker.  Recent examples and results from this firm include:

1. A drywaller was working inside a major rennovation and forced to walk up temporary scaffolding resembling a water falls to access work. In an attempt to avoid Worker’s Comp Coverage the foreman, absent from the jobsite at the time of injury, alleged the worker intentionally ‘staged’ a fall permanently rendering him cripple from a devastating knee injury, was stealing drugs from a coworker’s lunch, and had a nonexistant prior injury according to his foreman. Result: Full benefits plus civil settlement.

2. A surveyor who stepped on a covered, unmarked, unsigned vent cover to make a mark, and then fell 22 feet breaking bones in both legs, heel, and tibia permanently disfiguring him was just stupid, negligent, frolicking, and careless by stepping on the concealed hazard testifed the party chief who told him to step there. Result: Full benefits and $1.85M Civil Award.

3. A young electrician, inadequately trained fresh out of the marines, is electrocuted when unknown to him the pole he was told to climb was in fact receiving voltage from two different sources from two different directions. The foreman who told him to climb the dangerously energized pole alleged the decedent was wreckless and suicidal. Result: Full benefits and $2.5M Civil Award to his bride of two years.

4. A carpenter forced to work in the rain or quit slips and falls from a school roof falling onto his head becoming permanently brain injured requiring lifetime medical confinement. The superintendent and foreman claimed he should never have been on the roof and took the risk himself. Result: Full benefits to wife and children plus $5M Civil Award.

5. A tile setter is forced to work at night by the owner to finish.  The top landing had no guardrails and he topples 17′ fracturing his patella and permanently injured, missing a year of work.  The owner argues the tile setter should not have been working at night.  Results:  Full benefits and civil award.

Why do construction contractors hide and skew the truth? Because these working people could not talk for themselves and the employer/subcontractor/general contractor’s negligence will cost money. The injury may effect the employer-general contractor’s future contracts. The employer’s Worker’s Compensation Premiums will go up. The Subcontractor/General Contractor will be tied up in litigation and will receive a premium hike. OHSA Monetary Sanctions may be issued. These five workers each received Worker’s Compensation Benefits and recovered a total $10,000,000 civilly when the truth came out and the misinformation given the light of day.

OSHA Rules are designed to protect the worker. Company Safety Officers, Supervisors and Foreman are supposed to watch out for the worker pressed to perform. Do not be ashamed or too embarassed to seek adquate compensation. If you are injured on the job, comply truthfully with all inquiries from the employer, general contractor, OSHA, and or any official inquiries. You are not at fault for the contractor’s dangerous premises. The contractors will only look out for their interests after you are injured, not yours.